Digital Assets as Financial Products
Stirling & Rose responds to ASIC on digital assets and financial products.
ASIC v Block Earner
Stirling & Rose analyses the Block Earner judgment.
Stirling & Rose Token Mapping Submission
Stirling & Rose addresses the government’s role in regulating the crypto ecosystem, and the preference for a functional approach over a bespoke crypto-asset taxonomy.
UK Law Commission Paper on Digital Assets
Stirling & Rose responds to the UK Law Commission’s recent consultation paper on the treatment of digital assets as property.
ASIC commences first Australian Court action on crypto assets as unlicensed financial products
ASIC has issued civil penalty proceedings for making false, misleading and deceptive representations and engaging in an unlicensed conduct regarding a non-cash payment facility involving a crypto-asset.
Critical Technologies in the National Interest
Distributed ledger technology should be considered a critical technology, however so too should digital assets and smart legal contracts. Read our submission here.
A16Z Licences and Copyright Law in NFTs
The new A16Z Licences published provide NFT owners with hard-coded, immutable rights.
What’s next for crypto regulation?
Stirling & Rose’s submission on crypto asset secondary service providers. Financial market integrity and stability ultimately requires the responsible regulation of crypto assets.
To Map or not to Map?
Stirling and Rose responds to The Australian Government “crypto token mapping” exercise by cautioning the reliance on token’s function being static.
Complex Money
Complex Money will be endlessly divisible, endlessly replicable, programmable, composable.